Copyright & Monkey Selfie

Who holds the copyright in a monkey selfie situation?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Paper Proposals

Hello all. After completing your midterm, your next goal is to begin your paper proposal. Your paper proposal should center on answering questions regarding mass communication and law or ethics. (You can also propose the intersection of law and ethics in regard to mass communication.) In previous semesters, students have looked at libel law and social media likes, privacy law and drones, and advertising law and celebrity spokespeople on Instagram. Here is information about writing the paper proposal. Here is more Paper Proposal Advice. This information may also be helpful. There is discussion post for you in Webcourses to share your paper proposal questions and how you would answer the question (methodology). Please post by Friday, March 23 by midnight. We will build on this proposal in the following weeks.
Read more

Taping & Recording

State Laws While the U.S. federal law only requires one-party consent, many states have accepted different laws. In some states all parties must give their consent or at least be notified that the call is about to be recorded (with necessary opt-out option: if you don’t like them to record the call, you can ask them to stop recording). There also was a case law decision from many years ago (the 1950's) that went to the Supreme Court and affirmed that the federal law does not supersede state authority/statutes unless the call or the tap crosses state lines – that is why each state went ahead and established their own guideline/statute. States Requiring One Party Notification Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas Colorado District Of Columbia Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nebraska Nevada New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Oklahoma Oregon Ohio Rhode Island ...
Read more

Advertising Regulation

The FTC has approved some changes to the use of testimonials in ads. Here's a summary of some of the changes: "Updated guidelines on ad endorsements and testimonials under final review by the Federal Trade Commission—and widely expected to be adopted—would end marketers' ability to talk up the extreme benefits of products while carrying disclaimers like "results not typical" or "individual results may vary." Here is a link to a press release from the FTC about the changes. Here is more about the Pizza Hut v Papa John's lawsuit. Here is more about the CAN-SPAM Act. It contains important information on advertising through emails.
Read more